![]() Ben Hueso’s SB 1105, championed locally by County Supervisor Terra Lawson-Remer, would create a new, countywide agency focused on low-income housing, but first it needs to pass through the vaunted “suspense file” on Thursday.Īndrew Keatts and Scott Lewis broke down the bill in this week’s Politics Report. ![]() It’s a big week for a bill that’s been overlooked in the legislature, but which could bring a big change to local public affairs. San Diego County Supervisor Terra Lawson-Remer / Photo by Adriana Heldiz Politics Report: Sacramento Could Give San Diego a New Public Agency ICYMI: Last week Halverstadt broke down other revelations from Michell’s July 21 deposition, including the former city executive’s testimony that she gave a physical copy of what was purportedly a confidential legal analysis to lawyer Cory Briggs, who was then a candidate for city attorney, as she mulled becoming a whistleblower. Michell and her attorney were adamant in a subsequent interview with Voice that she only disposed of documents she understood could be purged per city policy. Halverstadt reports that Michell denied directing the deletion of any digital records but said she did ask an assistant to shred some copies of investigative memos about 101 Ash. In a July 21 deposition, former city Chief Operating Officer Kris testified that the May 11 letter was “inaccurate” and politically motivated, according to a draft transcript obtained by Voice’s Lisa Halverstadt.Ĭity Attorney Mara Elliott said it sent the letter after San Diego police revealed Michell in 2020 directed the city’s IT department to erase cell phone and computer records related to the two buildings. records to be deleted, the city’s former top bureaucrat disputed those allegations under oath. Two months after the City Attorney’s Office accused her of ordering 101 Ash St. Ex-COO Says She Didn’t Order Deletion of Ash Records It’s unclear how the city will comply with the ruling – it could increase the number of cannabis companies it allows to operate, or it could rescind existing licenses. It’s just not certain what can or will happen next.” “The legal system is holding the city accountable to follow its duly enacted ordinance, and its duly adopted, publicly adopted, and published regulations. “They didn’t follow their own rules,” said David Demian, Caligrown’s attorney. One politically connected company that got a permit to operate there didn’t even apply for that area. Now, the city has to keep the company in the running for one of its limited permit opportunities, but there’s one problem: the city has already issued all the permits its rules say can operate in the part of the city the company applied for. But as Voice of San Diego contributor Jackie Bryant breaks down in a new story, a court ruling in a case over a particularly thorny permit discrepancy could make the whole thing even more confusing.Ĭaligrown, a cannabis company, sued the city over its rejected permit request, and appellate judges in July sided with the company, arguing the city failed to follow its own process when it rejected their application. Getting permits to operate cannabis dispensaries in Chula Vista is already “arbitrary and capricious,” according to companies operating within the growing industry.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |